Optimizing Strength and Muscle Power Assessment in Older Adults: Innovations in Evaluation and Strength Training

Maintaining strength and physical performance is essential for a high quality of life, especially for older adults. Beyond aesthetics, resistance training plays a crucial role in improving muscle mass, preventing falls, enhancing mobility, and sustaining independence. In this article, we explore the latest advancements in strength assessment and training methods, with practical tips for integrating them into daily routines.

 

Why Muscle Power Matters for Older Adults

Muscle power—the ability to generate force quickly—is a key measure of musculoskeletal health. Studies show that muscle power, more than muscle strength, is a better predictor of physical performance, mobility, functional independence, and even mortality (Lauretani et al. 2003; Bean et al. 2003; Coelho-Júnior et al. 2024). Interestingly, muscle power starts to decline earlier and at almost double the rate of muscle strength (Kennis et al. 2014). As a result, it is a critical factor in maintaining functionality and independence as we age.

 

The 5-Sit-to-Stand Test (5-STS): A Key Assessment Tool

The 5-Sit-to-Stand Test (5-STS) is a widely accepted way to assess functional capacity in older adults. It measures the time it takes to stand up and sit down five times, arms crossed, while engaging the muscles of the lower body and trunk. This simple test not only evaluates muscle strength and coordination but also reflects essential daily functions like standing up and walking.

Research has consistently linked 5-STS performance to mobility, balance, and fall prevention (Sayers et al. 2005; Mayson et al. 2008). The faster an individual completes the test, the greater their independence and physical capability (Corrigan & Bohannon 2001). As a result, the 5-STS is considered more functionally relevant than single-joint exercises, making it an ideal muscle quality index (MQI) (Brown et al. 2016; Fragala et al. 2014).

 

Understanding Muscle Quality and the Muscle Quality Index (MQI)

Muscle quality refers to how efficiently your muscles produce force and power—not just the quantity of muscle mass. As we age, muscle quality tends to decline, even if muscle mass remains constant, leading to reduced functionality (Goodpaster et al. 2006). The MQI is a formula-based tool that accounts for factors like leg length, body mass, and 5-STS performance to estimate muscle power (Baltasar-Fernandez et al. 2021; Takai et al. 2009).

Studies have shown strong correlations between these muscle power estimates and overall health, underscoring the importance of this tool in strength assessments (Alcazar et al. 2020). However, recent innovations—such as incorporating Functional Electromechanical Dynamometry and Load-Velocity (L-V) profiling—offer even more precise ways to measure muscle capacity and personalize training programs.

 

The Load-Velocity Relationship: A Game-Changer in Muscle Capacity Measurement

The Load-Velocity (L-V) profile measures the relationship between the load being moved and the speed of movement. Recent research has validated this profile as a safer alternative to traditional methods like the one-repetition maximum (1RM) test, especially for older adults where safety and fatigue are concerns (Pérez-Castilla et al. 2021).

By evaluating three key variables—maximum strength (L0), maximum contraction velocity (V0), and maximum power—the L-V profile allows for a comprehensive understanding of an individual’s neuromuscular capacity (Pérez-Castilla et al. 2022). This information helps trainers tailor programs to address specific deficits in either strength or speed, maximizing training efficiency and outcomes for older adults.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Strength Assessment

In upcoming articles, we’ll delve deeper into how Functional Electromechanical Dynamometry can quickly and safely determine the L-V profile in older adults. This technology promises to make strength training more personalized and effective for this growing population.

 

References:

  1. Alcázar, J., Aagaard, P., Haddock, B., Kamper, R. S., Hansen, S. K., Prescott, E., Alegre, L. M., Frandsen, U., & Suetta, C. (2020). Age-and sex-specific changes in lower-limb muscle power throughout the lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 75(7), 1369–1378.
  2. Alcázar, J., Losa-Reyna, J., Rodriguez-Lopez, C., Alfaro-Acha, A., Rodriguez-Mañas, L., Ara, I., García-García, F. J., & Alegre, L. M. (2018). The sit-to-stand muscle power test: An easy, inexpensive and portable procedure to assess muscle power in older people. Experimental Gerontology, 112, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.08.006
  3. Anan, M., Hattori, H., Tanimoto, K., Wakimoto, Y., Ibara, T., Kito, N., & Shinkoda, K. (2017). The coordination of joint movements during sit-to-stand motion in old adults: the uncontrolled manifold analysis. Physical Therapy Research, 20(2), 44–50.
  4. Baltasar-Fernandez, I., Alcazar, J., Rodriguez-Lopez, C., Losa-Reyna, J., Alonso-Seco, M., Ara, I., & Alegre, L. M. (2021). Sit-to-stand muscle power test: Comparison between estimated and force plate-derived mechanical power and their association with physical function in older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 145, 111213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2020.111213
  5. Bean, J. F., Leveille, S. G., Kiely, D. K., Bandinelli, S., Guralnik, J. M., & Ferrucci, L. (2003). A comparison of leg power and leg strength within the InCHIANTI study: which influences mobility more? The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(8), M728–M733.
  6. Brown, J. C., Harhay, M. O., & Harhay, M. N. (2016). The muscle quality index and mortality among males and females. Annals of Epidemiology, 26(9), 648–653.
  7. Coelho-Júnior, H. J., Calvani, R., Álvarez-Bustos, A., Tosato, M., Russo, A., Landi, F., Picca, A., & Marzetti, E. (2024). Physical performance and negative events in very old adults: a longitudinal study examining the ilSIRENTE cohort. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(1), 33.
  8. Corrigan, D., & Bohannon, R. W. (2001). Relationship between knee extension force and stand-up performance in community-dwelling elderly women. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(12), 1666–1672.
  9. Cuoco, A., Callahan, D. M., Sayers, S., Frontera, W. R., Bean, J., & Fielding, R. A. (2004). Impact of muscle power and force on gait speed in disabled older men and women. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59(11), 1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.11.1200
  10. Fragala, M. S., Fukuda, D. H., Stout, J. R., Townsend, J. R., Emerson, N. S., Boone, C. H., Beyer, K. S., Oliveira, L. P., & Hoffman, J. R. (2014). Muscle quality index improves with resistance exercise training in older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 53, 1–6.
  11. Goodpaster, B. H., Park, S. W., Harris, T. B., Kritchevsky, S. B., Nevitt, M., Schwartz, A. V, Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., Visser, M., & Newman, A. B. (2006). The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health,  aging and body composition study. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 61(10), 1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059
  12. Hetherington-Rauth, M., Magalhães, J. P., Alcazar, J., Rosa, G. B., Correia, I. R., Ara, I., & Sardinha, L. B. (2022). Relative Sit-to-Stand Muscle Power Predicts an Older Adult’s Physical  Independence at Age of 90 Yrs Beyond That of Relative Handgrip Strength, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time: A Cross-sectional Analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 101(11), 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001945
  13. Kennis, E., Verschueren, S., Van Roie, E., Thomis, M., Lefevre, J., & Delecluse, C. (2014). Longitudinal impact of aging on muscle quality in middle-aged men. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 36(4), 9689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9689-1
  14. Lauretani, F., Russo, C. R., Bandinelli, S., Bartali, B., Cavazzini, C., Di Iorio, A., Corsi, A. M., Rantanen, T., Guralnik, J. M., & Ferrucci, L. (2003). Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 95(5), 1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003
  15. Lindemann, U., Muche, R., Stuber, M., Zijlstra, W., Hauer, K., & Becker, C. (2007). Coordination of strength exertion during the chair-rise movement in very old  people. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62(6), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.6.636
  16. Maki, B. E., & McIlroy, W. E. (2006). Control of rapid limb movements for balance recovery: age-related changes and  implications for fall prevention. Age and Ageing, 35 Suppl 2, ii12–ii18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl078
  17. Mayson, D. J., Kiely, D. K., LaRose, S. I., & Bean, J. F. (2008). Leg strength or velocity of movement: which is more influential on the balance of  mobility limited elders? American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 87(12), 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818dfee5
  18. Pérez-Castilla, A., Jukic, I., & García-Ramos, A. (2021). Validation of a novel method to assess maximal neuromuscular capacities through the load-velocity relationship. Journal of Biomechanics, 127, 110684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110684
  19. Pérez-Castilla, A., Jukic, I., Janicijevic, D., Akyildiz, Z., Senturk, D., & García-Ramos, A. (2022). Load-Velocity Relationship Variables to Assess the Maximal Neuromuscular Capacities During the Back-Squat Exercise. Sports Health, 14(6), 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211064603
  20. Sapega, A. A., & Drillings, G. (1983). The definition and assessment of muscular power. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 5(1), 7–9.
  21. Sayers, S. P., Guralnik, J. M., Thombs, L. A., & Fielding, R. A. (2005). Effect of leg muscle contraction velocity on functional performance in older men and  women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(3), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53166.x
  22. Suzuki, T., Bean, J. F., & Fielding, R. A. (2001). Muscle power of the ankle flexors predicts functional performance in community‐dwelling older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(9), 1161–1167.
  23. Takai, Y., Ohta, M., Akagi, R., Kanehisa, H., Kawakami, Y., & Fukunaga, T. (2009). Sit-to-stand test to evaluate knee extensor muscle size and strength in the elderly:  a novel approach. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 28(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.28.123

Compartir:

Entradas recientes

Entérate de las últimas noticias

Vladimir Zatsiorsky: Mastering Strength Training Through his vision of Maximum, Repeated, and Dynamic Efforts

Optimizing Strength and Muscle Power Assessment in Older Adults: Innovations in Evaluation and Strength Training

Different Approaches to Determining the Maximum Dynamic Force or 1RM: New Trends Driven by Technology

Our Partners

Our Gallery

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo.